This was created right when Ford was going through radical changes in its design house. Angular yet smooth lines were adorning the bodywork. Triangles and curves working together in the panels to create something truly for the 21st century. This was a car that looked not only good, but way better than the competition. It was also fitted with powerful engines, so it was fast. And it was a Ford, so it was cheap to buy, run and insure. And yet, it was still tarnished. Anyone who bought one was labeled as a Mondeo man, despite the fact that the true persona of the Mondeo man had moved on to some Korean import.

So what of the Porsche Boxster? Well, this is an interesting car. It was first launched at the very end of the 20th Century when the entire world was in party mode, and in fear of the so-called Y2K Bug (a devastating thing that would supposedly cause the world's computer systems to shut up shop just because of a deadly three extra zeros on the date. Anyway, the Boxster was hailed as a replacement (if a bit late) for the similar 1970s Porsche 914: a car which shared the exact same two seat, mid engine layout as the Boxster. It (the Boxster) quickly gained a healthy reputation as a fun, cheap alternative to the rather expensive and serious 911. But this is where it all went wrong for the Boxster. In the early 2000s, the two seat sports car market found itself crammed full of alternative drives, most of them much cheaper (and in rare cases faster) than the Boxster. As Top Gear's Richard Hammond sadly stated in one of his reviews of the Boxster "the only reason you would buy a Boxster, is because you cant afford to buy a 911" Jeremy Clarkson (from the same programme) then went on to say that "buying a Boxster is advertising the fact that your life hasn't turned out as well as you'd hoped"
Now, I value the opinion of these two expert motoring journalists most of the time but really, these comments had me annoyed. For one, they were viewing the Boxster as a sort of 'cheap 911' which is plainly isnt. They also said that buying a Boxster would give a person a bad image. This is clearly ludicrous. If you saw two people at the traffic lights, one in a Boxster and one in a Hyundai, whose life do you think has worked out better? Sadly, their silly opinions seemed to have turned into fact, and the merits of the actual car in question have been forgotten about.
The Porsche Boxster has a been honed, refined and improved on all levels in its four incarnations to date. The new one for instance is a real looker, and the essence of James Dean's 1950s Porsche 550 Spyder have been woven into the bodypanel shapes like silver thread on a wedding dress. The design also shows a bit more of its own personality which is much more creative, seeing as previous Boxsters just looked like shrunken 911s. The Boxster could be one of the finest sports cars ever made. Its balanced layout, good looks and great engine note make it a truly excellent car. Its just a shame everyone seems to laugh at it, and write it off as a "poor man's 911"
What a shame.
Now, is the Boxster's fate because of the great 911 or because of the merely good Boxster?
ReplyDeletePersonally, the Box looks a bit short to me, looks like it doesn’t go very fast and in general, and I don't like it that much.
Still, good post
Hey, now that you finished your exams you can post again!
ReplyDeleteCan you name the car in this video?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=RIuAZThCooU